Matters Concerning Citing in Academic Discourses

There is a bone of disconcertion concerning citing in academia – that tends to denote “old” citations and/or references do not generate significant and relevant credibility an author’s academic discourse. This perception about old then regularises what I view as imprecise material makes less consequential impact on the Similarly, there defective assumption “new” or “latest” warrant discourses. It these conflicting, yet competing presumptions problematic. Therefore, my question is, should particular citation be discredited basis it gauged “old”? However, am aware may suggest researcher’s lack extensive research dependent focus study. if, remains applicable contemporaneously significant? What if can figured point departure for future scholarly discourses? Personally, this premise citation(s) leaves outstanding gap between credible determinative citation, how philosophy knowledge generated from such citations.